You are here
Ethics Proceeding Confidentiality Takes a Hit in Utah, Logically Enough
Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010
Robert Wechsler
Let me take a logical approach to the topic of government ethics proceeding
confidentiality before I look at what has been happening in Utah this last week.
This is not just about the investigation and early discussion of ethics complaints, for which executive sessions are already allowed, but everything the EC does, from meetings to documents.
The Tribune editors point to an essential problem with such a rule: "the aura of secrecy that would surround commission proceedings would undermine the very purpose of the body -- to help bolster, or restore, the public's faith in state government by assuring that lawmakers are held accountable for poor conduct."
But it's worse than this. This bills show that some legislators will do anything they can to protect their personal interests, even when it comes to ethics codes.
Thank goodness for the news media. The criticisms of the bills worked. The sponsor of the bills, Sen. John Valentine, also a leader in pushing the concept of an independent ethics commission, has said he has changed his mind, according to an article in yesterday's Deseret News.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
Government ethics is intended to protect the public from officials acting in their own interest rather than in the public interest.
Acting like this is considered unethical conduct.
It is in the interest of officials to hide their unethical conduct from the public.
It is in the public interest to know about officials' unethical conduct.
Therefore, it is unethical conduct for government officials to try to hide their unethical conduct from the public.
Inserting into an ethics code a provision to allow unethical conduct is doubly unethical.
This is not just about the investigation and early discussion of ethics complaints, for which executive sessions are already allowed, but everything the EC does, from meetings to documents.
The Tribune editors point to an essential problem with such a rule: "the aura of secrecy that would surround commission proceedings would undermine the very purpose of the body -- to help bolster, or restore, the public's faith in state government by assuring that lawmakers are held accountable for poor conduct."
But it's worse than this. This bills show that some legislators will do anything they can to protect their personal interests, even when it comes to ethics codes.
Thank goodness for the news media. The criticisms of the bills worked. The sponsor of the bills, Sen. John Valentine, also a leader in pushing the concept of an independent ethics commission, has said he has changed his mind, according to an article in yesterday's Deseret News.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
Story Topics:
- Robert Wechsler's blog
- Log in or register to post comments