You are here
A Miscellany
Thursday, March 24th, 2011
Robert Wechsler
Some Problems with Mayoral Executive Orders in Philadelphia
On January 25, Philadelphia Mayor Nutter signed three ethics-related executive orders, which I would love to link you to, but cannot. How effective, except as a way to get the council moving on ethics reform, are executive orders that can't be found online? These orders deal with nepotism, family-oriented conflicts, outside employment, and gifts.
Their limitations don't stop at inaccessibility. First, although they apply to 85% of the city's employees, the orders do not apply to the City Council, the Sheriff's Office, the City Commissioner's Office, the Registrar of Wills, the City Controller, or the District Attorney's Office, according to an article in the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Nor, according to an advisory alert posted on the city's ethics board page, does the ethics board have jurisdiction to interpret or enforce the executive orders.
In addition, according the advisory alert, the executive orders cover subject matters in the city's ethics code, which means that it's harder now to comply to the law than it used to be, and the mayor's Chief Integrity Officer becomes, for the time being, the arbiter regarding the executive orders.
The advisory alert ends with the upsetting warning: "A ruling, waiver or exception granted with respect to an executive order would not apply or resolve issues under the Public Integrity Laws," that is, under the ethics code.
The council is the only body that can apply these executive orders, as law, to all city officials and employees, and work out inconsistencies with the ethics code. I could find nothing showing that, in the last two months, the council has done anything with respect to ethics reform.
Being Extra Responsible
According to an editorial in the Verde Independent, a fire board member in Camp Verde, who was elected in November, resigned because he is a consultant to a company that might do business with the fire department in the future. The editorial praises him for dealing responsibly with his possible conflict.
Resignation appears to be going too far considering that the conflict is so indefinite and is limited, in the sense that the board member could withdraw from participation if the contract came before his board.
However, it is important to look at the situation from the client's point of view. Your consultant gets elected to the fire board, and you realize that you might want to do business with the fire department. If you win a bid or, even worse, get a no-bid contract, even if the consultant withdraws, it will look like you were making use of your consultant's position on the board. The stink that might happen would be bad for you, and bad for the fire board. The relationship with the fire board member might even prevent your bidding for or getting a contract. Concern for the client, from the client's point of view, makes the consultant's resignation look more reasonable.
A Large School System Turns Its Ethics Over to the City's Ethics Program
According to an article on the KPLU website, the Seattle school system, after state auditors found nearly $2 million in misspent funds by school district employees and, worse, an “atmosphere of fear and intimidation” that prevented anyone from blowing the whistle on the perpetrators, has decided that it wants to turn its ethics program over to the city's Ethics and Elections Commission. Although the EC will oversee ethics training and investigation, it would have no enforcement powers, because the school system ethics policy, which would remain in place, does not provide for civil penalties (and it's not clear the school system has the legal authority to do this), only discipline, which must be handled internally. For more on this relationship, see this article in the Seattle Times.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
On January 25, Philadelphia Mayor Nutter signed three ethics-related executive orders, which I would love to link you to, but cannot. How effective, except as a way to get the council moving on ethics reform, are executive orders that can't be found online? These orders deal with nepotism, family-oriented conflicts, outside employment, and gifts.
Their limitations don't stop at inaccessibility. First, although they apply to 85% of the city's employees, the orders do not apply to the City Council, the Sheriff's Office, the City Commissioner's Office, the Registrar of Wills, the City Controller, or the District Attorney's Office, according to an article in the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Nor, according to an advisory alert posted on the city's ethics board page, does the ethics board have jurisdiction to interpret or enforce the executive orders.
In addition, according the advisory alert, the executive orders cover subject matters in the city's ethics code, which means that it's harder now to comply to the law than it used to be, and the mayor's Chief Integrity Officer becomes, for the time being, the arbiter regarding the executive orders.
The advisory alert ends with the upsetting warning: "A ruling, waiver or exception granted with respect to an executive order would not apply or resolve issues under the Public Integrity Laws," that is, under the ethics code.
The council is the only body that can apply these executive orders, as law, to all city officials and employees, and work out inconsistencies with the ethics code. I could find nothing showing that, in the last two months, the council has done anything with respect to ethics reform.
Being Extra Responsible
According to an editorial in the Verde Independent, a fire board member in Camp Verde, who was elected in November, resigned because he is a consultant to a company that might do business with the fire department in the future. The editorial praises him for dealing responsibly with his possible conflict.
Resignation appears to be going too far considering that the conflict is so indefinite and is limited, in the sense that the board member could withdraw from participation if the contract came before his board.
However, it is important to look at the situation from the client's point of view. Your consultant gets elected to the fire board, and you realize that you might want to do business with the fire department. If you win a bid or, even worse, get a no-bid contract, even if the consultant withdraws, it will look like you were making use of your consultant's position on the board. The stink that might happen would be bad for you, and bad for the fire board. The relationship with the fire board member might even prevent your bidding for or getting a contract. Concern for the client, from the client's point of view, makes the consultant's resignation look more reasonable.
A Large School System Turns Its Ethics Over to the City's Ethics Program
According to an article on the KPLU website, the Seattle school system, after state auditors found nearly $2 million in misspent funds by school district employees and, worse, an “atmosphere of fear and intimidation” that prevented anyone from blowing the whistle on the perpetrators, has decided that it wants to turn its ethics program over to the city's Ethics and Elections Commission. Although the EC will oversee ethics training and investigation, it would have no enforcement powers, because the school system ethics policy, which would remain in place, does not provide for civil penalties (and it's not clear the school system has the legal authority to do this), only discipline, which must be handled internally. For more on this relationship, see this article in the Seattle Times.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
Story Topics:
- Robert Wechsler's blog
- Log in or register to post comments