Edward T. Hall's classic book, Beyond
Culture (Anchor Books, 1976), is not a government ethics book.
But a lot of the wisdom in this brilliant book can be applied to our
field.
In ethics, there are two basic approaches: (1) an ends-based
approach, also referred to as utilitarian or consequentialist; and
(2) a means-based approach, also referred to as rules-based or
deontological. Government officials, and most people when speaking
about government, generally use the former, while government ethics
uses the latter. This causes a lot of problems.
There is a great deal of thought-provoking material in Chip and Dan
Heath's book Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard
(Crown, 2010). Change has proved hard in every single city and
county in the United States. Those seeking government ethics reform
can learn a lot from this book.
In memory of Albert O.Hirschman, an important economist and
political scientist who died last month, I want to apply some of the
ideas from his most famous book, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (1970), to local government ethics (back in 2009, I
pulled out a few thought-provoking passages from his 1983 book,
I don't talk much in this blog or in my book Local Government
Ethics Programs about character. However, there is another approach to
government ethics that is sometimes referred to as "the character
approach." For example, the Josephson
Institute trains local officials on the six pillars of
character. There are ethics codes, too, that take a character
approach to government ethics.
This second of two posts on Michael Sandel's new book, What Money
Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (Farrar Straus, 2012),
includes a few fascinating takes on different aspects of government ethics, including
preferential treatment, municipal marketing, skyboxes, and the sensitive topic of inappropriate
incentives.