This is the place to share your opinions of and experiences with judicial review of Ethics Commission decisions. For example, who should be able to seek judicial review: complainants, respondents, other interested parties, anyone? Are there situations where judicial review is inappropriate, too expensive (where there is nothing but a reprimand)? Should there be judicial review of alleged procedural irregularities?

216. Judicial Review.

Any person or entity aggrieved by a decision of the Ethics Commission may seek judicial review and relief pursuant to ----- of [state law].