Skip to main content

Safra Working Papers

Cincinnati Situation V - Officials Entering Into Contracts with Their City

The family firm's $100 million development takes this matter beyond ordinary conflicts, due to state and local laws on officials entering into public contracts with their city. What makes this issue far more serious than an ordinary conflict, which can be dealt with responsibly through recusal, is that both state and local law require the official to choose between his government position and an interest in a public contract. It is this far more drastic remedy that has recently escalated emotions surrounding the council member's situation.

Cincinnati Situation VI - Frequent Conflicts

As serious as the appearance of impropriety that arises from the council member's family firm seeking TIF money and a tax abatement from the city is the fact that any developer or member of a developer's family sitting on a city council faces not just the occasional ethical controversy, as has been the case in this situation. Such an individual faces an ongoing series of possible conflicts, most of which do not lead to complaints, requests for advisory opinions, or controversies.

Circled Wagons: Loyalty and Municipal Ethics

I was inspired to take a different point of view of municipal ethics while reading Charles Taylor's review of Jonathan Lear's new book, Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation in the latest issue of the New York Review of Books. Please bear with me as I describe the book before I say why it is relevant to municipal ethics. The book looks at cultures that have been devastated by having their way of life destroyed.

Cities & Counties Initiatives for COGEL

COGEL Task Force -- Local and Municipal Ethics Initiatives

Members

CHAIR: Carla Miller, Ethics Officer, City of Jacksonville, Florida VICE-CHAIR: John Steiner, Austin, TX Ethics Commission Mark Davies, New York City Conflict of Interest Board Helen Valkavich, City of San Antonio, TX Robert Meyers, Miami/Dade Ethics Commission Leeann Pelham, Los Angeles City Ethics Commission

Cities Indirectly Accepting Funding from Interested Parties

When the economy is booming, local government corruption feeds off the sale of government land, development projects, and construction contracts. When the economy is doing poorly, there is usually less money floating around to fund corruption. But in bad times, local governments are willing to accept the help of companies and nonprofits, which might have (or appear to have) their own interests at stake in what they fund for local governments. This leads to another set of problems.

Citizens to Redistrict Austin Council

Update: January 30, 2013 (see below)

Four years ago, I wrote a blog post about the conflict at the heart of the local redistricting process, where the members of a legislative body are deeply involved in decisions that will determine whether or not they, and their party or faction, are re-elected. This conflict shares some similarities with the involvement of officials in selecting ethics commission members and enforcing government ethics laws.

Citizens United and Conflicts of Interest Law

The Citizens United decision from the Supreme Court this week says that, for the purpose of First Amendment free speech rights in a political context, corporations are persons. Until now, they were considered fictional persons, since they lack such things as arms, brains, and the right to vote.

Will the majority's conclusions affect conflicts of interest law? Here's a conclusion from page 40, ending the decision's first section.

Citizens' Views of Ethics Reform in Jacksonville

I don't write about Jacksonville much, because my colleague at City Ethics, Carla Miller, is the city's ethics officer. She has been working hard to ensure that the city's ethics commission is given more authority and independence, and that the city's ethics laws are improved. This week, the council will be moving closer to approving, or undermining, reforms.

City Attorney's Advice re Conflicts of Interest: A New California Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court of California has handed down a decision that could have a significant impact on conflicts of interest cases. In The People v. Chacon, S125236 (February 8, 2007), the court found that Chacon, a former council member charged with a conflict of interest, could not use the defense that she had acted upon the advice of the city attorney. The advice concerned her entering into an employment contract as city manager.

City Ethics Essentials

Cities across the United States are creating and expanding Ethics Commissions, Ethics Offices and Inspector Generals in order to fight corruption and establish higher ethical standards for their governments. I will be posting some of the best ideas from these programs on this site. If you have comments on what is written, good, bad or just a stray idea, please comment! Carla Miller, president, City Ethics.

The first BEST PRACTICE entry is "Ethics Program Essentials". These are key points to consider when starting an ethics program.

City staffers get ethics introduction

The Jacksonville Daily Record today published a story covering the first ethics training since the new code revisions were ratified by Council on Tuesday last week. "Miller instructed the Council staff not to get too bogged down in the technicalities of the law, but to adopt an overall ethical mind set to help guide their decision-making."

City-Funded Redevelopment by Nearby Property Owners -- And How Not to Write Ethics Law

An article in today's Modesto Bee provides an excellent example of problems that arise when a city's redevelopment is accomplished by people who can benefit directly from it.

The five-person Riverbank, California Council has three members who own property downtown, which is going through a redevelopment phase (apparently, things like theaters, not low-cost housing).  The council members also sit on the city's Redevelopment Agency.

Cleaning Up a Political Culture - Don't Necessarily Do the First Things That Come to Mind

The DiMasi case, discussed in the most recent blog entry, is not the only ethics case in Massachusetts that has drawn a lot of attention. The result of a perception of increasing ethical misconduct has led the governor to appoint a new task force on public integrity, according to an editorial in today's Boston Globe with an inapt plumbing metaphor in its title, "Drain the Ethics Cesspool."

Clear Evidence of How Dealing Irresponsibly with a Conflict Can Undermine the Public Trust

One great thing about the Internet is that it provides a clear picture of how people respond to officials who do not deal responsibly with their conflicts of interest, and how such irresponsible actions can undermine people's trust in government.