A report worth reading was recently published by the OECD: Self-Regulation
and Regulation of the Lobbying Profession. Its focus on European
countries provides a valuable complement to American lobbying
regulation. Below is a condensed version of the report's executive
summary:
This week, Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox announced
a "toolbox" for local governments to create local ethics policies.
Local government ethics is already governed by state statutes, but
local governments can apparently supplement these rules with local laws and ethics
boards.
The Ethics Resource Center’s first National Government Ethics Survey has just come out, and is available free at the ERC’s website, although it requires registration. It is the result of a random 2007 telephone poll of government employees, and is part of a series of polls looking at ethics in different sorts of workplaces. City Ethics' Founder, Carla Miller, was on the Advisory Group for this survey.
Here are some of the Survey’s findings relating to local governments.
The FBI had to work hard for years to get a grand jury indictment of
former New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin yesterday (a searchable PDF of
the indictment is attached; see below).
It's worth noting two Washington
Post-ABC News poll questions concerning the Citizens United decision
on corporate-funded independent expenditures. Most notable is the fact
that the reaction was roughly the same across the political spectrum.
The ruling was opposed by 85% of Democrats polled, 76% of Republicans,
and 81% of independents. These days, it's rare to have such a response
on any important issue.
One of the wonderful things about local government ethics is that
every mayor or county executive feels qualified to act as if he was
establishing the first local government ethics program ever. It's
sort of like choosing what will go in a bento box, except that there
are no rules (e.g., only one sushi roll, or you've got to have miso or the clear
soup).
On April 5, the county commission in Wayne County, MI (which includes Detroit) passed a new ethics
ordinance (attached; see below), following multiple scandals. It
contains many good provisions, but it does not create a government
ethics program.
The new year is a good time for ethics commissions and officers to look
ahead to 2009 and set goals and priorities. According to an
article in today's Jacksonville Daily
Record, this is exactly what the Jacksonville (FL) ethics
commission did at its first meeting of the new year. As did the city's
ethics officer, City Ethics' very own Carla Miller.
It's been almost two years since the New
York Times broke the story on the abuses of New York City council
earmarks slush fund, which totaled about $50 million a year. This week, the
council member featured in the Times article was expelled from the
state senate for a violent act committed against his female companion,
according to an
article in yesterday's Times.
The NYC Campaign Finance Board has put together an excellent Doing Business
Database, consisting of a searchable list of individuals (principal owners, principal officers, and senior managers of entities) “doing
business” with a wide assortment of city agencies and
quasi-governmental entities, including through contracts, bids or
proposals for contracts, concessions, franchises, grants, economic
development agreements, and pension fund investment agreements, as well
as those engaged in real property transactions (the sa
According to a 33-count indictment filed yesterday by the United States Attorney for New Jersey, former Newark, NJ mayor Sharpe James appears to have been just another crooked urban mayor out to help himself and his friends to the sort of perks that aren't supposed to come with public service: trips, tickets, cruises, the usual.
What is sad about this particular instance of corruption is that James is a folk hero in Newark, despite the fact that he continues to deny all charges and that he shows no concern about furth
Who expects a wonderful local government ethics surprise to come from
New Jersey? Check out the Department of State's Pay-to-Play
Ordinances page, which provides links, county by county, of
municipal ordinances placing a limited contribution ban on those
entering into municipal contracts.
In 2008, New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine established a special task
force to take a look at the state's local government ethics program.
In September 2010, the task force filed a report that recommended
substantial changes to the program (attached; see below). Nothing
was done.
In an earlier blog entry, I took the side of the Louisiana Board of Ethics in its dispute with the state legislature over whether it has jurisdiction over legislators who participate in debate when they have a conflict of interest. In another case, which the Board of Ethics lost on appeal, I feel the Board of Ethics was wrong, and I feel it is instructive to say why.
The matter involved two parish council members who voted for themselves for mayor pro-tem.
A former chancellor of Maricopa Community College in Phoenix, Arizona continued to work for the college on contract, while also having a business on the side that did business with the college on a no-bid basis. The business was set up by the college when he was chancellor and was given to him a few months after he retired.
The former chancellor denies any conflict of interest because his business (Sedona Conferences and Conversations, which does business with colleges around the world) is not always profitable. 'If I were really crazy about making money, I wouldn't be doing Sedona.
Court decisions, especially when combined with criminal enforcement
of ethics violations, can be very harmful to local government ethics. The court in a Monterey County case involving a serious §1090
conflict of interest matter that officials were not only aware of,
but appear to have helped create, has used two recent California
court decisions to limit prosecution to just one official.