Skip to main content
CityEthics Breaking the oxymoron: "City Ethics"

Main navigation

  • Topics
  • Articles
  • Resources
  • About

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Safra Working Papers

April 25, 2013

The First Government Ethics App Is Here!


It's here at last:  the first government ethics app (at least that I know of).
Read more →
Transparency & Disclosure December 10, 2012

The FOI Alternative to Conflict Disclosure

In a quality government ethics program, every official and employee involved in a matter publicly discloses any possible conflict and withdraws from the matter. But what if a city or county does not have a quality government ethics program? How is the public to know whether conflicts are being handled responsibly?
Read more →
August 23, 2010

The Fort Worth Council, Mayor, and City Attorney Deal Irresponsibly With a Conflict Situation

Updates: August 24 and 26, 2010 (see below)

For those who, like me, believe that neither a mayor nor a local legislative body nor a city attorney has any business getting involved in the government ethics process, here's an example you can use of the mess they can make when they do get involved.
Read more →
Ethics Commissions & Administration May 24, 2012

The Gap Between Advice and Enforcement, and The Isolation of Independence

I was on a panel this week as part of the annual Citywide Seminar on Ethics in New York City Government, co-sponsored by the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) and the Center for New York City Law at the New York Law School. The panel was called "Challenges & Solutions in Government Ethics in Other Municipalities."
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest November 25, 2008

The Gift

Gift disclosure and limitations are an important part of government ethics. But rarely do we think of what gifts mean. Usually this goes little further than politicians saying, "I can't be bought."
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest December 1, 2008

The Gifts Dilemma

There are two principal ways of dealing with gifts to government officials and employees, and both of them are unsatisfactory, although certainly better than ignoring them completely. One approach is prohibition, the other disclosure.
Read more →
Enforcement & Complaints April 27, 2012

The Going Rate, Statutes of Limitations, and Spousal-Dealing

A few issues arise in the case of a Pennsylvania state senator who reached a settlement this week with the state's ethics commission that included a fine of $21,000, according to an article in yesterday's Montgomery County Times Herald.
Read more →
March 5, 2014

The Good and Bad of Palm Beach County's EC Selection Process

The independent selection of EC members is a great thing for making a government ethics program appear independent of those under its jurisdiction and for ensuring that an ethics commission remains fully stocked with members. But how this selection process is actually accomplished matters, too.
Read more →
Local Government Practice March 6, 2009

The Government Attorney and Zealousness

Lawyers are supposed to zealously represent their clients. After all, Canon 7 of the ABA Code of Professional Responsibility says, "A lawyer should represent a client zealously within the bounds of the law." This requirement applies as much to government lawyers as it does to private lawyers, right?
Read more →
Local Government Practice April 16, 2011

The Government Attorney-Client Privilege in a Local Government Investigatory Context

Is the attorney-client privilege, in the context of an inspector general's (or, for that a matter, an ethics commission's) investigation of misconduct in city government, "sacred," as Chicago's corporation counsel insists? Is it even appropriate?

This is a long post that will be fascinating to many, will raise hackles in some, but will be of less interest to others. If you want to cut to the chase, read the summary paragraph at the end and move on.
Read more →
Local Government Practice April 7, 2008

The Hatch Act's Restrictions on Running for Local Government Office

There is one local government conflict of interest that is often ignored because it was created at the federal level by a federal statute. The statute is known as the Hatch Act of 1939 (Title 5, Subchapter III), originally known as An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities (they don’t make statute names like they used to). The Hatch Act limits the political activities of local government employees who are principally employed by programs funded in whole or in part by the U.S.
Read more →
Ethics Codes & Reform December 23, 2008

The Holiday Spirit and the Spirit of Ethics Laws

It's pop quiz time. Read the following ethics code provision and hypothetical, and answer the question that follows them.

No public servant shall solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any thing of economic value as a gift or gratuity from any person or from any officer, director, agent, or employee of such person, if such public servant knows or reasonably should know that such person has or is seeking to obtain contractual or other business or financial relationships with the public servant's agency
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest December 4, 2009

The Home-Field Advantage Theory of Government Ethics

One way of describing government ethics is that it involves the use and abuse of the power that goes with government officials' positions. Not all such abuses are covered by ethics laws, of course. This blog post looks at an instance of abuse that is not covered. It involves a state legislature and, especially, one state representative, in a state where local ethics is handled at the state level.
Read more →
Local Government Practice December 21, 2010

The Image Consultant's Role in Local Government Ethics

Things have changed. It used to be that the first thing you did when you found out the local ethics commission was investigating you was hire a lawyer (which is itself a change from the days when you found out you were being investigated by the D.A. and handed him a bribe).
Read more →
Ethics Codes & Reform July 31, 2006

The Importance of Being Readable

One of the most serious problems with municipal ethics codes is their unreadability. Few of those who write them seem to consider the capabilities of the code's audience: municipal officials and employees without a legal education. In 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission insisted that documents intended to disclose information to the public should be written in plain English, and to help with the process, it put together a Plain English Handbook: How to Create Clear SEC Disclosure Documents (www.sec.gov/pdf/handbook.pdf).
Read more →
Ethics Codes & Reform August 18, 2011

The Importance of Characterizing an Ethics Provision


How you present an ethics provision can make all the difference. Take a pay-to-play ordinance proposed in Fort Wayne, which would limit the amount of contributions and gifts that can be given to city officials by an individual or entity if it wants to have a no-bid contract with the city.
Read more →
Transparency & Disclosure April 1, 2009

The Importance of Public Financial Disclosure

According to an article yesterday in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, there's a battle going on in New Orleans, but this time it involves a flood of public documents, as well as a trickle of financial disclosure forms. The battle is between the mayor and the city council, on one side, and a civil rights organization called the Louisiana Justice Institute on the other.
Read more →
Ethics Commissions & Administration May 7, 2009

The Importance of Publicizing Ethics Programs

If the governmental ethics community had a publicity program, the headline of a front-page article in Tuesday's Kansas City Star would be a call to arms:

Legislators agree: Ethics laws are puppies, not pit bulls


The gist of the article is that, in Missouri and Kansas, the state ethics commissions are underfunded, the state ethics laws are too weak, and enforcement is insufficient to act as a deterrent.
Read more →
Ethics Commissions & Administration September 8, 2009

The Independence of New Orleans' Ethics Program

The New Orleans Ethics Review Board, formed in 2006, certainly wins an A for independence. According to the city ethics code, six of its seven members are chosen by the mayor (with council approval) from nominees submitted by the heads of five local private universities (the seventh is the mayor's to select). Unfortunately, the result is that the majority of board members work at the universities.
Read more →
Ethics Codes & Reform January 25, 2012

The Institutional Corruption Behind Police Abuse of Immigrants

It's not every day that a neighboring town makes the front page of the New York Times. It's especially surprising when the reason is, at heart, a local government ethics problem.
Read more →

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 85
  • Next page ››

Search

User account menu

  • Log in
CityEthics
Local government ethics, explored
© 2026 CityEthics.org