City Related
Partial Withdrawal Taints a Proceeding in NJ, But Only If It's an Attorney
Robert Wechsler
When it comes to conflicts of interest, is a local government
attorney primarily an attorney or a local government official? I
would answer this question, "Definitely an official." But recently
the New Jersey Supreme Court answered this question, "Definitely an
attorney." In fact, had the attorney been an administrator, the
opinion suggests, the court's decision would have been different.
How to Untwist a Straightforward Post-Employment Violation
Robert Wechsler
It is a pleasant surprise to find an intelligent conversation about
local government ethics in an article and the comments to it. The
latest example of this occurred yesterday
in the New Haven (CT) Independent, an online newspaper.
Problems Arising from a Bribery Case in Jefferson Parish, LA
Robert Wechsler
Several interesting issues arise from a recent ethics case in
Jefferson Parish, a suburb of New Orleans with about 430,000 people.
According to an
article in the Advocate yesterday, an employee of a large
parish contractor sent the following e-mail to a council member's aide, who forwarded it to the council member:
“I would like to schedule a meeting with Councilman Spears to meet with Jim Martin, Vice President of GEC to discuss business development in District 3.
The Advantages of Having an IG Be Part of a Local Ethics Program
Robert Wechsler
In New Orleans, it is the ethics board that selects the city's inspector general.
According to an
article in the July issue of New Orleans magazine, it took the
city a long time to get an inspector general. The first time an IG's contract came up for
renewal, the ethics board voted for it unanimously. The board chair,
civic organizations, and business groups all praised his work.
It's Time for Savannah to Declare Its Ethics Program's Independence
Robert Wechsler
Update October 7, 2013 (see below)
On Independence Day weekend, I like to focus on the independence of local government ethics programs. The public naturally trusts any ethics program that has not been selected by the officials under its jurisdiction. An EC that is not dependent on the appointment and budgetary powers of a mayor or local legislative body can function, and be seen to function, fairly and without bias.
On Independence Day weekend, I like to focus on the independence of local government ethics programs. The public naturally trusts any ethics program that has not been selected by the officials under its jurisdiction. An EC that is not dependent on the appointment and budgetary powers of a mayor or local legislative body can function, and be seen to function, fairly and without bias.
Suit Against Contractor Contribution Ban in Albuquerque
Robert Wechsler
According to a
New Mexico Telegram article, four Albuquerque contractors sued
the city's ethics board, claiming that a 2007 charter provision banning
contributions from contractors violates
their free speech rights.
Attorneys on an EC, and Ethics Proceeding Confidentiality
Robert Wechsler
Lawyers and confidentiality can both be serious obstacles to the effectiveness of a
government ethics program. An ethics case in Trumbull, CT provides a
good look at how this can happen.
Attorneys on an Ethics Commission
Attorneys on an Ethics Commission
Current Ethics Reform II - Phoenix
Robert Wechsler
In June, the Phoenix council took a step toward ethics reform,
based on the recommendations of a task force (I critiqued the task
force recommendations in an April post entitled "Disappointing
Report from Ethics Task Force in Phoenix").
A Council Member Who's a Realtor, and Matters Affecting Property Values
Robert Wechsler
Does a council member who is a realtor have a conflict with respect
to any council matter that affects real estate, including a matter that affects property values ? That appears to be
the view of NJ Superior Court Judge Grasso in a decision this week,
according to an
article in Thursday's Asbury Park Press.
Constituent Services and Preferential Treatment Provisions
Robert Wechsler
On April 30, the D.C. ethics board reached a settlement with a
council member (attached; see below), whereby he was admonished for
having "used the prestige of his office or his public position for
the private gain" of a company by influencing health department
personnel to leave the site of the business without issuing a notice
of closure, allowing the business to continue to operate for several
more hours.