Skip to main content

Search

Home City EthicsBreaking the oxymoron: "City Ethics"

User account menu

  • Log in
Powered by Drupal

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Publications
    • Top 10 Movies
  • LAB Tools
    • Harvard Introduction
    • CDAs - Working Paper 42
    • Safra Working Papers
  • Academic Experts
    • Dan Ariely
    • Jonathan Haidt
    • Max Bazerman
    • Robert Prentice

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Ethics Commissions & Administration February 25, 2010

What Can Ethics Officials Do Outside Their Jurisdiction?

New York City has had more problems with council earmarks than Washington, D.C. (see recent blog post on D.C.), and now the city's ombudsman has come up with a different approach, an approach from outside the council, in fact, from someone with no actual jurisdiction over the council. His plan shows that ethics officers or bodies can make a difference even where they have no actual jurisdiction.
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest February 24, 2010

Cronyism and Ethics

This month, in Portland, CT, home of the stone used to build New York City's brownstones, the new ethics commission found that it was a violation of the town's ethics code for the board of selectmen (the town's management board) to hire attorneys who had given campaign contributions to the board of selectmen majority's party town committee, according to the EC's minutes. The contributions of the particular attorneys were $20-250.
Read more →
February 23, 2010

Ethics Proceeding Confidentiality Takes a Hit in Utah, Logically Enough

Let me take a logical approach to the topic of government ethics proceeding confidentiality before I look at what has been happening in Utah this last week.

    Government ethics is intended to protect the public from officials acting in their own interest rather than in the public interest.

    Acting like this is considered unethical conduct.

    It is in the interest of officials to hide their unethical conduct from the public.

    It is in the public interest to know about officials' unethical conduct.

Read more →
Ethics Commissions & Administration February 22, 2010

Ethics Commission Political Activity


Update: March 1, 2010 (see below)

The political activity of ethics commission members, staff, and ethics officers is an important topic. The issue has arisen this week with respect to Connecticut's Office of State Ethics, according to Jon Lender's Government Watch column in yesterday's Hartford Courant.
Read more →
Transparency & Disclosure February 21, 2010

Another Side to Disclosure

Disclosure is almost always about what the public should know. But there is another side to disclosure: what the official should know. This is especially important in pay-to-play.
Read more →
February 20, 2010

A Conflict of Interest Exam Question from Long Branch, NJ

Especially in small towns, bankers often have business relationships with many people and, therefore, do not make the best board and commission members on account of the many conflicts they have or, more frequently, the appearance of impropriety.
Read more →
February 19, 2010

Quote of the Day

(In a debate about a revolving door provision, also known as a "cooling off period")

"You do not take pizza from the oven and put it straight in your mouth. I believe that we should not take our legislative service and put it right in our own mouth."

—Missouri State Senator Jason Crowell (from an article in the Columbia Missourian). Unlike most of my Quotes of the Day, I found this one delightful.

Read more →
February 19, 2010

New Poll Results on Corporate and Union Independent Expenditures

It's worth noting two Washington Post-ABC News poll questions concerning the Citizens United decision on corporate-funded independent expenditures. Most notable is the fact that the reaction was roughly the same across the political spectrum. The ruling was opposed by 85% of Democrats polled, 76% of Republicans, and 81% of independents. These days, it's rare to have such a response on any important issue.
Read more →
February 18, 2010

New Robert S. Bennett Report on D.C. Council Earmark Grants et al.

Special Counsel Robert S. Bennett's report on the District of Columbia council's earmark grants and personal services contracts was made public yesterday by the Washington City Paper.
Read more →
February 18, 2010

Revolving Door or Merry-Go-Round?

Your big brother is a powerful member of city council, and you're just a deputy city clerk. There's got to be more than this! So you retire, take your pension of $68,000, and run for state representative, with all the support your brother and his friends can provide, adding another $86,000 in salary and the prospect of a second government pension. Not bad.
Read more →
  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • Next →
Subscribe to
CityEthics
Local government ethics, explored
© 2026 CityEthics.org