Proximity rules are common to local and state government ethics
codes nationwide (see my
blog post on them from five years ago). They require officials
to withdraw from any matter dealing with property within a certain
distance of property they own or rent, no matter how many others have property within the same proximity.
As I near the end of writing my local government ethics book, I am going
over local government ethics codes looking for unusual, but valuable
provisions to include in a special section that follows my discussion of the
run-of-the-mill provisions.
I would like to share one of these provisions that is truly worth thinking about. It appears in the Windsor, CO
ethics code:
An ethics bill in the District of Columbia, sponsored by council
member Muriel Bowser, went quickly through committee and was passed
by the council, with only one dissenting vote, on December 20 (the
final committee bill can be found here). What's amazing about
it is that, despite the speed with which it moved, Bowser's staff
made many improvements to the bill in response...
I came across a decision in Patty Salkin's Law
of the Land blog today involving a federal statute that
allows federal prosecution of those who give gifts to local
officials in amounts greater than $5,000. Proof of bribery is not...
Sometimes, conflicts are built right into ethics laws, partly because
it is in the political interest of those with conflicts, and partly
because they don't even view those laws as ethics laws.
A good example of this is the Connecticut law (CGS
§9-623) that places enforcement of municipal campaign finance
laws in the hands of city and town clerks. In Connecticut, clerks are
often elected...