Skip to main content
CityEthics Breaking the oxymoron: "City Ethics"

Main navigation

    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Ethics Codes & Reform
    • Ethics Commissions & Administration
    • Local Government Practice
    • Enforcement & Complaints
    • Transparency & Disclosure
    • Campaign Finance & Pay-to-Play
    • Resources & Learning
    • News & Commentary
    • Resources Overview
    • City Ethics Essentials
    • Working Definitions
    • Top Ten Ethics Films
    • Books of Interest
    • About City Ethics
    • Carla Miller
    • Robert Wechsler
    • Don McClintock

City Related

February 19, 2011

Stamford Antagonists Reach a Settlement!

Good news from Stamford. According to an article in yesterday's Stamford Advocate and another article that just appeared online two hours ago, the board of ethics reached a settlement with the chair of the board of finance, in which they agreed to withdraw all ethics complaints and the federal suit…
Read more →
February 17, 2011

Open Meeting Act Enforcement Problems in Oklahoma

Oklahoma's Open Meeting Act, which applies to local governments, ends with an unusual provision. That provision is the only provision in the act that deals with enforcement. It says that a willful violation of a provision is a misdemeanor, and that someone guilty of a violation may be fined up to $…
Read more →
Local Government Practice February 15, 2011

Public Servants and Free Speech

It is worth noting that the respondent member of the Stamford board of finance in the matter covered in the preceding blog post raised both a legislative immunity and a First Amendment free speech defense in his federal court complaint unsuccessfully seeking an injunction against his ethics proceed…
Read more →
February 14, 2011

Not Withdrawing As a Responsible Way to Deal with a Conflict in Stamford, CT

There are times when withdrawing from a vote is in fact not a responsible act, but rather an act in one's own self-interest. In such a case, a responsible official should participate and do what is in the public interest. According to an article in Saturday's Stamford (CT) Advocate, one such instan…
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest February 13, 2011

Is It Right to Prohibit Conflicts?

According to an article in Friday's San Bernardino Sun, a San Bernardino city council member accused of a conflict of interest resigned. He owned a towing company whose major source of income is a contract with the city. The contract was made before he joined the council. According to an article Sa…
Read more →
February 10, 2011

Vernon, the Dragons, and the Knights

Yes, boys and girls, it's time for another episode of every government ethics lover's favorite tale, Vernon and the Dragons. In the last episode, back in November, the dragon known as Los Angeles County was considering a proposal to require the city of Vernon to competitively bid housing for the ci…
Read more →
Campaign Finance & Pay-to-Play February 8, 2011

Applying a Pay-to-Play Ordinance in Trenton

Update: February 10, 2011 (see below) Trenton's city attorney and mayor have been going through an elaborate dance in the last week, since the city attorney decided to void a contract between the city and a law firm that made a large contribution to a PAC that supported the new mayor's candidacy. T…
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest February 7, 2011

Even Face-Value Tickets Can Be Preferential

Last month, I wrote about how the Green Bay ethics board hadn't met much more than the Packers had won Super Bowls. Well, now that the Packers have won another, it's time for the ethics board to meet again (the last time it met was in 1999). One thing Green Bay and Pittsburgh officials have in comm…
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest February 4, 2011

Proximity to Property and the Appointment of Zoning Board Members

According to an article in The Record this week, a Clifton, New Jersey council member is being accused of dealing irresponsibly with a conflict by participating in a discussion about, although not voting on, the reappointment of two members of the city's zoning board. The conflict is an unusual one…
Read more →
Conflicts of Interest February 1, 2011

How Massachusetts Handles Favors and Favoritism

In my recent blog posts about Gwinnett County, especially the first, I spoke about how the problem of not following formal processes is a serious government ethics problem, but is often not covered by ethics codes. The Massachusetts Ethics Commission has recently entered into disposition agreements…
Read more →

Pagination

  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 28
  • Next page ››
Subscribe to City Related

Search

User account menu

  • Log in
CityEthics
Local government ethics, explored
© 2026 CityEthics.org