Do expertise and conflicts go together more like love and marriage, or
like horse and carriage? In other words, are they necessary or are they
outdated in this age of government ethics?
Almost two years ago, I
wrote about the self-serving nature of attempts at ethics reform in
the village of Niles, outside Chicago. A lot has happened since then,
but in terms of an ethics program, not much.
A week ago, Transparency International published its fifteenth annual Corruption
Perceptions Index, which scores countries on the basis of a variety
of independent reports on and surveys about corruption, including those
from the World Bank and other development banks, and those surveying
journalists, business executives, and international organization staff.
More election-related news. Here are two arguments against an amendment to the Utah constitution
that, if approved by voters on November 2, would establish a partially independent legislative ethics
commission. The arguments are made in an official
ballot
issue publication of the state of Utah.
"Current political thinking generally laments this development, arguing
that it cheapens the process and puts all politicians in a bad light."
But she sees it as a good development. I don't agree.
Does the Prospect of Attacks Cause Politicians to Better Police Themselves?
The term "situational
ethics" derives from a particular theory of a priest named Joseph
Fletcher, but it is more generally understood to mean dealing with
ethics in terms of a particular situation and particular goals
(ends-oriented ethics). In other words, it is ethics that allows for
different rules in different circumstances, but also for self-serving,
sometimes hypocritical, ethical statements and actions.
Most people define "ethics" in a way that doesn't really fit into the
scheme of government ethics, which focuses on conflicts of interest.
Even the definitions
section of this website defines "ethics" as "a major branch of
philosophy that involves analysis of right conduct."
The Missouri Ethics Commission has put up a
nice slideshow-with-audio presentation on the many changes made
to its ethics and campaign finance laws in Senate
Bill 844 (it used Adobe Presenter software, but there are likely
other alternatives). It's a good way to do reform-specific training.
I've been writing a lot about the controversies surrounding a new
Broward County (FL) ethics code, but there's also been controversy in
the Broward County School District that is likely to lead to an ethics code of its own (according to a
Miami
Herald editorial on Saturday, a former school board member pleaded guilty
to federal bribery charges this year, and another member revealed that
her husband works for a firm that frequently lobbies the school board).