A three-year FBI investigation of Cuyahoga County (which includes
Cleveland) appears to have begun with a sting operation involving
building inspectors, where an undercover agent offered bribes, and they
were accepted, according to an
article in the Cleveland Plain
Dealer. Six building inspectors were charged in May.
In a recent blog
post, I wrote about the fining of the executive director of
Philadelphia's board of ethics for violating confidentiality rules.
That blog post focused on dealing responsibly with a possible violation of an ethics code provision (although not actually an ethics provision, but instead a disciplinary rule). Now I would like to focus on confidentiality rules and
penalties in the government ethics context, and the many constitutional, policy, and logical problems these rules and penalties run into.
Due to President Obama, the word "empathy" is getting tossed around a
lot lately. What interests me is that his definition of the word
"empathy" is central to what ethicists call "moral imagination." And
moral imagination is central to government ethics.
Here's Pres. Obama's definition of "empathy" from his book The Audacity of Hope:
Vernon, the "Dream Machine" I've written about in two previous blog
posts (1 and 2), is back in the news.
This time, according to an
article in yesterday's Los Angeles Times, it appears that there is a
crack in the self-serving power structure that allowed a grandfather
and grandson to run this purely industrial California city (pop.
Ottawa is currently in the grips of its mayor's influence-peddling
trial. The allegations are that the mayor tried to get another mayoral
candidate out of the race by offering him money and a federal position.
The Ottawa Citizen has an
excellent chronology of what allegedly occurred. There is a lot of
evidence, but most of it appears to be hearsay, at least so far. But I'm more interested in an unrelated ethics matter that occurred a
couple of months ago.
There is a bright side to the British Parliament expenses scandal. For
one thing, many M.P.'s had the fortitude to walk right by that enormous parliamentary
trough and eat at home instead.
Second, Parliament showed the world how a failure to do the right thing
and do it transparently — seek larger incomes — and instead to take
public money clandestinely and then, when news started leaking out, to
deny and obfuscate, can completely undermine trust in a public
institution.
According to an
article on yesterday's Philly.com website, the Philadelphia Board
of Ethics fined its executive director $500 for violating the
confidentiality rules of the city's ethics code. The story is
instructive in how to handle such difficult matters. (Disclosure: I
know and have a lot of respect for both of the individuals in this
matter.)
One of the big stories in government ethics this week involves an attempt in
Tennessee to consolidate the state ethics and campaign finance
commissions, which on its face sounds like a good way to save money
during these tough times. But when politicians deal with ethics laws
and bodies, things are rarely that simple, especially when the state's ethics director is fired in the midst of the debate.