Conflicts of Interest
November 29, 2006
Other Conflicts of Interests
This is the place to discuss additional conflict of interest provisions. Below are some comments added at the end of 100, but there are several more such provisions that can be found in ethics codes. What are your thoughts about and experiences with other conflict provisions?
Ethics Codes & Reform
November 29, 2006
Honesty in Applications for Positions
False statements are a means of unfairly manipulating a situation in one's own favor. Please share your thoughts about this problem and your experiences with attempts to solve it through an ethics code or otherwise.
100(21). Honesty in Applications for Positions
No person seeking to become an official or employee,* consultant* or contractor may make any false statement, submit any false document, or knowingly withhold information about wrongdoing in connection with employment by or service for the city.
Local Government Practice
November 29, 2006
Meeting Attendance
Many officials face a conflict every evening they have a meeting scheduled: between their obligation to attend a meeting of a board they sit on and their desire to do one of a number of different things. Many officials choose something else often enough that it has an effect on the board's effectiveness.
Please share your thoughts about this provision, and your experiences with problems involving meeting attendance and various attempts to deal with these problems.
100(20).
Ethics Codes & Reform
November 29, 2006
Falsely Impugning Reputation
There is a lot of talk about courtesy in politics, but most discourtesy involves lack of respect and uncontrolled emotions on the part of officials in their relations with each other. It becomes an ethical problem when citizens are attacked in order to intimidate them and others from being involved in local politics. The conflicting interest here is central to democracy: participation in government. False personal attacks are a favorite means of decreasing participation and citizen oversight.
I've been on the receiving end myself, and it is ugly.
Ethics Codes & Reform
November 29, 2006
Complicity with or Knowledge of Others' Violations
Complicity with and knowledge of violations are two minefields it is worth crossing. They involve not only dotting the i's, but they also go right to a central element of responsibility: are you responsible for what others do, especially when you are involved or you let it happen. So much of what happens in any organization involves knowingly letting others -- especially subordinates -- do the dirty work.
Note that this provision includes outsiders, such as people doing business with the city.
Conflicts of Interest
November 29, 2006
Consultants
Consultants are an in-between group. They're not officials or employees, nor are they people who do business with the city. They advise or sometimes act for the city, and have access to confidential information as well as special relations with city staff. Please share your thoughts about and experiences with the inclusion of consultants in an ethics program.
100(17).
Conflicts of Interest
November 29, 2006
Endorsements
Endorsing products and services is a minor conflict, but this is the sort of conflict that, if not specified, would not be considered a conflict under general language. Please share your thoughts about its inclusion and experiences with this problem.
100(16). Endorsements
No official or employee* in his or her official capacity may publicly endorse products or services.
Conflicts of Interest
November 29, 2006
Fees and Honorariums
Accepting fees and honorariums is a minor conflict, but one that occurs a great deal. Please share your thoughts and experiences.
100(15). Fees and Honorariums
No official or employee* may accept a fee or honorarium for an article, for an appearance or speech, or for participation at an event, in his or her official capacity. However, he or she may receive payment or reimbursement for necessary expenses related to any such activity.
Conflicts of Interest
November 29, 2006
Transactions with Subordinates
This provision deals with the potential coercion, or appearance of coercion, that accompanies outside dealings between officials and subordinates. Please share your experiences with this problem and ways to deal with it in ethics codes.
