I don't usually turn over an entire blog post to someone else, although I would like very much to do it. This
letter
to the editor by Kevin Haggerty, the Lackawanna County
(PA) deputy
director of government and community affairs (and candidate for state
representative), which appeared in the
Times Leader on Saturday, is too well written to summarize, and it says it all.
Let's Not Drink to It
Yes, it has happened. Local government ethics has been compared to
Prohibition.
According to an
article
in the La Porte (IN) Herald Argus last Friday, this comparison was made by a superior court judge in town, who said that Prohibition
"was intended to increase the productivity of workers ... but all it
really did was create more problems.”
According to an
article in the Metro West Daily News on Friday, the Ashland (MA)
board of selectmen sent two reported allegations of possible acts of ethical
misconduct to the state ethics
commission. The request sought not enforcement, but clarification. I hope by
"clarification" the board meant that it is seeking advice about
continuing the behavior. Its other option was to file a complaint with
respect to past behavior.
Conflicting Employment Is Nothing to Rave About
Some forms of conflicting employment are wrong to the extent that the
only way to handle the conflict responsibly is to resign from one of
the jobs. If this is not done, even a minor conflict can be very
damaging, especially when there are already other problems. This is the
case with an administrator at the Los Angeles Coliseum who worked on
the side as a consultant for a company that annually produced a rave at
the Coliseum.
It's nice to see conflicts of interest being opposed by political party
leaders, but not when they're taken out of context. The opposition this week
has been limited to public sector unions. The conflict involves
public sector unions making contributions to candidates who will be in
a position to deal with union compensation.
Term limits, the recession, a new kind of governmental district, and a drive to save and manage local parks have all contributed to a fascinating ethics situation in Pierce County, Washington, home of
Tacoma. Just last year I stayed in Pierce County and visited some of
these parks, so this story is a little more concrete to me than most I
write about.
I'm going to keep showing how wrong the criminal
enforcement of ethics laws is until there is at least some sign of
movement away from it. This time I will do it by looking at two recent
proceedings in which serious penalties are involved, one criminal, the
other civil. The criminal penalties are about punishment, the civil
penalties about strengthening the ethics program and sending important
messages to other officials and employees.