Officials and lawyers tend to act as if they were Platonists. That
is, they talk about conflicts of interest as if they existed in a
ideal form, divorced from reality.
The FBI had to work hard for years to get a grand jury indictment of
former New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin yesterday (a searchable PDF of
the indictment is attached; see below).
I learned this week that the board I administered until last July,
the New Haven Democracy Fund board (the Fund is a public campaign
financing program for the city's mayoral election), no longer has
enough members to hold an official meeting. The seven-member board
has three members, and it needs four members to have a quorum.
It's rare to find a newspaper article that truly appreciates the
work a city ethics officer does. So I'm including the entire article
below. It's from
the Jacksonville Times-Union, and Jacksonville's ethics officer happens
to be City Ethics President Carla Miller. Had it been anyone else, I
would have run the article right away.
Here's an odd ethics program rule. According to an
article last week in the Advocate-Messenger, the Boyle County,
KY ethics commission, which has jurisdiction over all the
municipalities in the county, requires that a town council vote on
whether a matter may be referred to the ethics commission.
One government ethics question that does not have a general answer
is whether boards of education or school systems are under the
jurisdiction of city or county ethics programs. The answer is
sometimes, but generally not.
There are several reasons for this. One is that many, probably most
school systems have different boundaries than cities and counties.
Generally, these are regional, including all or parts of multiple
cities, towns, and counties.
It would be really helpful if people could find recommendations for
ethics reform all in one place, but this rarely happens. Ethics task
forces and ethics commissions that ask for such recommendations from
good government groups, officials, and academics rarely make them
available to the public online. Collections of such recommendations
would be a useful resource both for those interested in government
ethics in the particular city or county, and for those elsewhere who
are considering ethics reform and looking for good ideas.
It can never be said too often that the quality of a government ethics
code is meaningless. What matters is how the ethics
program actually works.
Take Bridgeport, CT for example. It is the largest city in
Connecticut, with a population of 150,000. It is a poor city in a rich county, and it
has had a history of corruption, including the mayor's conviction on
federal corruption charges a decade ago.
Government ethics proceedings are usually not very satisfying for
those involved. Individuals rarely get to tell the entire story from
their point of view. Nor do they profit from hearing how others saw the situation or experienced the events. The format for ethics proceedings is
similar to the criminal justice system, with charges, a prosecution,
witnesses, documents, and the ethics commission as jury. Or a
settlement is reached, the equivalent of a plea bargain, and no
story is told at all.
In memory of Albert O.Hirschman, an important economist and
political scientist who died last month, I want to apply some of the
ideas from his most famous book, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (1970), to local government ethics (back in 2009, I
pulled out a few thought-provoking passages from his 1983 book,