Annapolis is an unusual little city in many ways. It may only have 40,000
residents, but it's the state capital, the county seat, the home of
the U.S. Naval Academy, and equidistant, and not far, from Baltimore
and Washington, D.C. With respect to government ethics, the county
for which it is the county seat, Anne Arundel County, has a relatively good
ethics program, complete with an executive director, which is
very unusual even for a county of half a million people.
In a quality government ethics program, every official and employee
involved in a matter publicly discloses any possible conflict and
withdraws from the matter. But what if a city or county does not
have a quality government ethics program? How is the public to know
whether conflicts are being handled responsibly?
On November 29, Florida State University’s LeRoy Collins
Institute and the new good government group Integrity Florida
released a report
entitled "Florida Counties Bridge the Ethics Policy Gap",
whichanalyzes the results of a survey of government
ethics programs and reforms in 45 of Florida’s 67 counties.
When the economy is booming, local government
corruption feeds off the sale of government land, development
projects, and construction contracts. When the economy is doing
poorly, there is usually less money floating around to fund
corruption. But in bad times, local governments are willing to
accept the help of companies and nonprofits, which might have (or appear to have) their
own interests at stake in what they fund for local governments.
This leads to another set of problems.
An
eye-opening report was published this week by the American
Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut. The report was based on a
survey of all the state's police departments regarding the filing of
complaints. Although complaints filed by the public against police
officers rarely involve conflicts of interest, some of the findings
are relevant to government ethics.
In
October, I wrote a blog post about a report commissioned by
the Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority (WMATA), based on an investigation of an
ethics issue involving a Washington, D.C. council member and transit
authority board member. The focus of my post was on the conflicted
situation of a city council member on a regional board.
Yesterday, at the annual conference of the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws (COGEL), the only association of state and local government ethics professionals, Judge Anthony Wilhoit was given the COGEL Award, which is
given annually to someone who has "made a significant, demonstrable,
and positive contribution to the fields of campaign finance,
elections, ethics, freedom of information or lobbying for a
significant period of time." As the executive director of the
Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission since 1997, Judge Wilhoit has
certainly made a substan
Between the American Thanksgiving holiday and throwing out my back so that I
couldn't sit at my computer, I missed one of the most fascinating
stories of the year: a judicial
dismissal of Toronto's mayor for a conflict of interest violation.
The conflict situation was minor, but the way the mayor handled it
and the way Toronto's ethics laws relating to council members, including